4.6 Article

Advanced Design Optimization Technique for Torque Profile Improvement in Six-Phase PMSM Using Supervised Machine Learning for Direct-Drive EV

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENERGY CONVERSION
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages 2041-2051

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TEC.2019.2933619

Keywords

Direct-drive; dq-frame model; electric vehicle; machine learning; permanent magnet synchronous machine; support vector regression; time-step finite element analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Few of the challenges with development of a single on-board motor for direct-drive electric vehicles include high torque density and low torque ripple. Therefore, in this paper, a 36-slot, 34-pole consequent pole six-phase permanent magnet synchronous machine (PMSM) has been optimized to address the aforementioned challenges for direct-drive application. Existing literature on optimization processes that rely solely on finite element models are restricted to three-phase machines only and also take longer computation time. Therefore, this paper proposes a novel optimization approach based on supervised machine learning for six-phase PMSM. In this approach, a non-conventional extended dual dq-frame model that accounts for higher order space harmonics in inductances and flux linkages has been developed and used for accurate computation of average torque and torque ripple of six-phase PMSM. Using the performance characteristics obtained from the extended dual dq-frame model for a set of initial design candidates, support vector regression algorithm is employed for supervised machine learning and increasing solutions in the design space. Furthermore, pareto front is used for selecting optimal machine models with maximum torque density and reduced torque ripple. Multi-objective trade-offs and comparison of initial and optimized designs based on average torque, torque ripple, efficiency and cost are performed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available