4.6 Article

Sensorless Control of IPMSM Using Moving-Average-Filter Based PLL on HF Pulsating Signal Injection Method

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENERGY CONVERSION
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages 43-52

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TEC.2019.2946888

Keywords

Band-pass filters; Demodulation; Phase locked loops; Harmonic analysis; Power harmonic filters; Rotors; Bandwidth; Interior permanent magnet synchronous motor (IPMSM); high frequency signal injection; band-pass-filter (BPF); low-pass-filter moving-average-filter; phase-locked-loop (PLL)

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51677049]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As for the sensorless control of interior permanent magnet synchronous motor (IPMSM), conventional high frequency (HF) pulsating signal injection method is widely used, which uses band-pass filter (BPF) and low-pass-filter (LPF) based phase-locked-loop (PLL), however it may face the problems of poor stability and long convergence time. Therefore, an improved signal demodulation algorithm based on moving-average-filter (MAF)-PLL is proposed. MAF, which makes full use of the HF signal periodicity and half-wave symmetry, has higher bandwidth and better harmonics suppression ability than BPF or LPF. Furthermore, a proportional-integral (PI) regulator is used to gain the rotor speed and an integrator is applied to estimate rotor position. Compared with the conventional method, the proposed method gets rid of BPF and LPF, contributing to improving the stability and dynamic performance. Besides, undetermined parameters are reduced to one, i.e., window length of MAF, avoiding complex parameters design and selection. The proposed HF pulsating injection method has simpler signal demodulation process and is easy to implement. Finally, the experimental results have verified the feasibility and effectiveness of proposed method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available