4.7 Article

Robust Adaptive Beamforming via Simplified Interference Power Estimation

Journal

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TAES.2019.2899796

Keywords

Interference; Signal to noise ratio; Estimation; Array signal processing; Covariance matrices; Uncertainty; Adaptive systems; Interference-plus-noise covariance matrix (INCM); INCM reconstruction; interference power estimation; robust adaptive beamforming (RAB)

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61571081, 61671120]
  2. Key Project of Sichuan Education Department of China [18ZA0221]
  3. Sichuan Applied Basic Research Program [19YYJC0100]
  4. Sichuan Science and Technology Program [2018RZ0141]
  5. Guangdong Natural Science Foundation of China [2018A0303130064]
  6. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [2672018ZYGX2018J003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Adaptive beamformer is very sensitive to model mismatch, especially when the signal-of-interest is present in the training data. In this paper, we focus on the topic of robust adaptive beamforming (RAB) based on interference-plus-noise covariance matrix (INCM) reconstruction. First, we analyze the effectiveness of several INCM reconstruction schemes, and particularly analyze the impacts of interference power estimation on RAB. Second, according to the analysis results, we develop a simplified algorithm to estimate the interference powers, and a RAB algorithm based on INCM reconstruction is then presented. Compared with some existing methods, the proposed algorithm simplifies the interference power estimation of INCM reconstruction. Aligned with our analysis, simulation results demonstrate that the overestimation of interference powers hardly degrades the performance of adaptive beamforming, and our proposed algorithm achieves nearly optimal performance across a wide range of signal-to-noise ratios.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available