4.6 Article

Pyramid-Structured Depth MAP Super-Resolution Based on Deep Dense-Residual Network

Journal

IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING LETTERS
Volume 26, Issue 12, Pages 1723-1727

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LSP.2019.2944646

Keywords

Training; Convolution; Interpolation; Feature extraction; Computational modeling; Depth map super-resolution; residual learning; dense connection; deep convolutional neural networks

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61901197]
  2. Major Science and Technology Projects in Fujian, China [2018H0018]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi [20192BAB217005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although deep convolutional neural networks (DCNN) show significant improvement for single depth map (SD) super-resolution (SR) over the traditional counterparts, most SDSR DCNNs do not reuse the hierarchical features for depth map SR resulting in blurred high-resolution (HR) depth maps. They always stack convolutional layers to make network deeper and wider. In addition, most SDSR networks generate HR depth maps at a single level, which is not suitable for large up-sampling factors. To solve these problems, we present pyramid-structured depth map super-resolution based on deep dense-residual network. Specially, our networks are made up of dense residual blocks that use densely connected layers and residual learning to model the mapping between high-frequency residuals and low-resolution (LR) depth map. Furthermore, based on the pyramid structure, our network can progressively generate depth maps of various levels by taking advantages of features from different levels. The proposed network adopts a deep supervision scheme to reduce the difficulty of model training and further improve the performance. The proposed method is evaluated on Middlebury datasets which shows improved performance compared with 6 state-of-the-art methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available