4.7 Article

An Adaptive Channel Hopping and Dynamic Superframe Selection Scheme With QoS Considerations for Emergency Traffic Transmission in IEEE 802.15.6-Based Wireless Body Area Networks

Journal

IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages 3914-3929

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2019.2958936

Keywords

Wireless body area network; coexisting; interference; QoS

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [MOST 108-2221-E-005-019-MY3, MOST 108-2218-E005-013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In modern days, as medical technology advances and the worlds population grows, healthcare has been undergoing crucial changes. The common practice of clinical treatment is gradually being overhauled by ubiquitous healthcare systems. The wireless body area networks (WBANs) are becoming increasingly important for future healthcare applications. According to the human physiological information, WBAN not only sends the real-time notification to the user but also decreases the transmission delay of patient information to the physician for the medical decision. As medical emergency information must be transmitted after a disaster occurrence, the number of WBANs and emergency traffic increase in the particular area. In the situations, a large number of WBANs may be close to each other, thus causing inter-WBAN interference and increasing the transmission delay. Therefore, in this paper, we propose a dynamic channel and superframe selection scheme (DCSSS) in IEEE 802.15.6 WBANs. DCSSS records the channel interference degree which is used to adaptively select different superframe structures and to effectively transmit data. It mitigates the inter-WBAN interference to improve the transmission delay and QoS violation. Additionally, it increases the chance of successful data transmission before the deadline of the data as well as reduces power consumption.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available