4.5 Article

Retinal degeneration in mice expressing the constitutively active G90D rhodopsin mutant

Journal

HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages 881-891

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddaa008

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01EY021731, R00EY018085, P30EY011373]
  2. Research to Prevent Blindness

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rhodopsin is the G protein-coupled receptor in rod photoreceptor cells that initiates vision upon photon capture. The light receptor is normally locked in an inactive state in the dark by the covalently bound inverse agonist 11-cis retinal. Mutations can render the receptor active even in the absence of light. This constitutive activity can desensitize rod photoreceptor cells and lead to night blindness. A G90D mutation in rhodopsin causes the receptor to be constitutively active and leads to congenital stationary night blindness, which is generally thought to be devoid of retinal degeneration. The constitutively active species responsible for the night blindness phenotype is unclear. Moreover, the classification as a stationary disease devoid of retinal degeneration is also misleading. A transgenic mouse model for congenital stationary night blindness that expresses the G90D rhodopsin mutant was examined to better understand the origin of constitutive activity and the potential for retinal degeneration. Heterozygous mice for the G90D mutation did not exhibit retinal degeneration whereas homozygous mice exhibited progressive retinal degeneration. Only a modest reversal of retinal degeneration was observed when transducin signaling was eliminated genetically, indicating that some of the retinal degeneration occurred in a transducin-independent manner. Biochemical studies on purified rhodopsin from mice indicated that multiple species can potentially contribute to the constitutive activity causing night blindness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available