Journal
HUMAN FACTORS
Volume 62, Issue 3, Pages 424-440Publisher
SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0018720819896898
Keywords
exoskeleton; anthropometry; range of motion; executive function; somatosensation
Funding
- NASA [NNX15AR20G]
- NSF [1905524]
- NASA Space Technology Research Fellowships [NNX16AM71H]
- U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command Soldier Center research project [18-114]
- NASA [NNX15AR20G, 796976] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER
- Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
- Directorate For Engineering [1905524] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Objective To define static, dynamic, and cognitive fit and their interactions as they pertain to exosystems and to document open research needs in using these fit characteristics to inform exosystem design. Background Initial exosystem sizing and fit evaluations are currently based on scalar anthropometric dimensions and subjective assessments. As fit depends on ongoing interactions related to task setting and user, attempts to tailor equipment have limitations when optimizing for this limited fit definition. Method A targeted literature review was conducted to inform a conceptual framework defining three characteristics of exosystem fit: static, dynamic, and cognitive. Details are provided on the importance of differentiating fit characteristics for developing exosystems. Results Static fit considers alignment between human and equipment and requires understanding anthropometric characteristics of target users and geometric equipment features. Dynamic fit assesses how the human and equipment move and interact with each other, with a focus on the relative alignment between the two systems. Cognitive fit considers the stages of human-information processing, including somatosensation, executive function, and motor selection. Human cognitive capabilities should remain available to process task- and stimulus-related information in the presence of an exosystem. Dynamic and cognitive fit are operationalized in a task-specific manner, while static fit can be considered for predefined postures. Conclusion A deeper understanding of how an exosystem fits an individual is needed to ensure good human-system performance. Development of methods for evaluating different fit characteristics is necessary. Application Methods are presented to inform exosystem evaluation across physical and cognitive characteristics.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available