4.3 Article

Women-Only Cardiac Rehabilitation Delivery Around the World

Journal

HEART LUNG AND CIRCULATION
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages 135-143

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2020.01.015

Keywords

Cardiac rehabilitation; Women; Women only cardiac rehabilitation

Funding

  1. York University's Faculty of Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Women utilize cardiac rehabilitation significantly less than men, with gender-tailored programs improving adherence and mental health outcomes. However, globally, Women-Only CR classes are not commonly offered, predominantly in academic or tertiary facilities, serving more patients and offering more components compared to programs not offering Women-Only CR. Expanding delivery may require utilizing low-cost, less resource-intensive approaches such as online peer support in order to make Women-Only CR more accessible.
Background Women utilise cardiac rehabilitation (CR) significantly less than men. Gender-tailored CR improves adherence and mental health outcomes when compared to traditional programs. This study ascertained the availability of women-only (W-O) CR classes globally. Methods In this cross-sectional study, an online survey was administered to CR programs globally, assessing delivery of W-O classes, among other program characteristics. Univariate tests were performed to compare provision of W-O CR by program characteristics. Results Data were collected in 93/111 countries with CR (83.8% country response rate); 1,082 surveys (32.1% program response rate) were initiated. Globally, 38 (40.9%; range 1.2-100% of programs/country) countries and 110 (11.8%) programs offered W-O CR. Women-Only CR was offered in 55 (7.4%) programs in high-income countries, versus 55 (16.4%) programs in lowand middle-income countries (p<0.001); it was offered most commonly in the Eastern Mediterranean region (n=5, 55.6%; p=0.22). Programs that offered W-O CR were more often located in an academic or tertiary facility, served more patients/year, offered more components, treated more patients/session, offered alternative forms of exercise, had more staff (including cardiologists, dietitians, and administrative assistants, but not mental health care professionals), and perceived space and human resources to be less of a barrier to delivery than programs not offering W-O CR (all p<0.05). Conclusion Women-Only CR was not commonly offered. Only larger, well-resourced programs seem to have the capacity to offer it, so expanding delivery may require exploiting low-cost, less human resource-intensive approaches such as online peer support.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available