4.5 Article

Barriers to Cardiovascular Disease Preventive Behaviors Among OEF/OIF/OND Women and Men Veterans

Journal

HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 39, Issue 4, Pages 298-306

Publisher

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/hea0000844

Keywords

cardiovascular disease; barriers; preventive behaviors; OEF/OIF/OND veterans; sex differences

Funding

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Health Services Research and Development Project [IIR 12-118]
  2. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health [K23HL141644, R01HL125587]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: OEF/OIF/OND Veterans have an elevated risk for developing cardiovascular disease (CVD), but research suggests that engagement in CVD preventive behaviors is low even among at-risk individuals. It is critical to understand barriers to prevention engagement among Veterans to inform the development of tailored interventions addressing barriers and reducing CVD incidence. Method: The Women Veterans Cohort Study survey of OEF/OIF/OND Veterans (586 women and 555 men) assessed patient, interpersonal, and systems level barriers to CVD risk prevention. Prevalence of barriers was determined, and chi-squares were conducted to examine sex differences. Multivariate logistic regressions were conducted to determine if sex differences remained when adjusting for demographic factors (age, marital status, education, employment status). Results: Despite a low response rate (11.5%), endorsement of barriers was high for both women and men, with most (56.8%) not perceiving themselves to be at CVD risk. More men preferred making no lifestyle change (40.9% vs. 29.1%). More women endorsed lack of confidence (42.4% vs. 36.1%), stress (36.9% vs. 27.8%) and depression (36.9% vs. 27.8%), and inadequate social support (26% vs. 20.9%), along with the belief that their clinician does not perceive them as at risk (57.8% vs. 32%) and has not explained CVD preventive behaviors (19% vs. 12.3%). Multivariate analyses reduced statistical significance of sex differences. Conclusions: Given the low response rate, testing of efforts-for example, implementation science methods-to assess CVD risk reduction barriers in this population are needed, a task for which the Veterans Health Administration is well suited.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available