4.4 Article

The EVITA framework for evidence-based mental health policy agenda setting in low- and middle-income countries

Journal

HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages 424-439

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czz179

Keywords

Knowledge translation and exchange; evidence-informed policymaking; agenda setting; evidence uptake; research impact; evidence-based policymaking; research evidence; mental health; low- and middle-income countries; framework

Funding

  1. Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) [ES/J500057/1]
  2. INDIGO Medical Research Council (MRC) Partnership Grant [MR/R023697/1]
  3. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care South London at King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
  4. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care South London at King's College London NHS Foundation Trust
  5. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Asset Global Health Unit award
  6. National Institute of Mental Health of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01MH100470]
  7. UK Medical Research Council (MRC) [MR/R023697/1, MR/S001255/1]
  8. MRC [MR/S001255/1, MR/R023697/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The burden of mental illness is excessive, but many countries lack evidence-based policies to improve practice. Mental health research evidence translation into policymaking is a 'wicked problem', often failing despite a robust evidence base. In a recent systematic review, we identified a gap in frameworks on agenda setting and actionability, and pragmatic, effective tools to guide action to link research and policy are needed. Responding to this gap, we developed the new EVITA 1.1 (EVIdence To Agenda setting) conceptual framework for mental health research-policy interrelationships in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We (1) drafted a provisional framework (EVITA 1.0); (2) validated it for specific applicability to mental health; (3) conducted expert in-depth interviews to (a) validate components and mechanisms and (b) assess intelligibility, functionality, relevance, applicability and effectiveness. To guide interview validation, we developed a simple evaluation framework. (4) Using deductive framework analysis, we coded and identified themes and finalized the framework (EVITA 1.1). Theoretical agenda-setting elements were added, as targeting the policy agenda-setting stage was found to lead to greater policy traction. The framework was validated through expert in-depth interviews (n=13) and revised. EVITA 1.1 consists of six core components [advocacy coalitions, (en)actors, evidence generators, external influences, intermediaries and political context] and four mechanisms (capacity, catalysts, communication/relationship/partnership building and framing). EVITA 1.1 is novel and unique because it very specifically addresses the mental health research-policy process in LMICs and includes policy agenda setting as a novel, effective mechanism. Based on a thorough methodology, and through its specific design and mechanisms, EVITA has the potential to improve the challenging process of research evidence translation into policy and practice in LMICs and to increase the engagement and capacity of mental health researchers, policy agencies/planners, think tanks, NGOs and others within the mental health research-policy interface. Next, EVITA 1.1 will be empirically tested in a case study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available