4.4 Review

Microenvironmental contributions to hematopoietic stem cell aging

Journal

HAEMATOLOGICA
Volume 105, Issue 1, Pages 38-46

Publisher

FERRATA STORTI FOUNDATION
DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2018.211334

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Alborada Scholarship (University of Cambridge)
  2. Trinity-Henry Barlow Scholarship (University of Cambridge)
  3. R.O.C. Government Scholarship to Study Abroad (GSSA)
  4. Wellcome Trust
  5. MRC
  6. National Health Service Blood and Transplant (United Kingdom)
  7. European Union [ERC-2014-CoG-64765]
  8. Programme Foundation Award from Cancer Research UK

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) aging was originally thought to be essentially an HSC-autonomous process, which is the focus of another review in the same issue of Haematologica. However, studies on the microenvironment that maintains and regulates HSC (HSC niche) over the past 20 years have suggested that microenvironmental aging contributes to declined HSC function over time. The HSC niches comprise a complex and dynamic molecular network of interactions across multiple cell types, including endothelial cells, mesenchymal stromal cells, osteoblasts, adipocytes, neuro-glial cells and mature hematopoietic cells. Upon aging, functional changes in the HSC niches, such as microenvironmental senescence, imbalanced bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cell differentiation, vascular remodeling, changes in adrenergic signaling and inflammation, coordinately and dynamically influence the fate of HSC and their downstream progeny. The end result is lymphoid deficiency and myeloid skewing. During this process, aged HSC and their derivatives remodel the niche to favor myeloid expansion. Therefore, the crosstalk between HSC and the microenvironment is indispensable for the aging of the hematopoietic system and might represent a therapeutic target in age-related pathological disorders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available