4.8 Article

Evidence for large carbon sink and long residence time in semiarid forests based on 15 year flux and inventory records

Journal

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages 1626-1637

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14927

Keywords

carbon sequestration; carbon sink; carbon turnover time; ecosystem productivity; semiarid; soil carbon

Funding

  1. KKL-Jewish National Fund
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  3. Israel Science Foundation [1976/17, 2579/16]
  4. IMOS-French [3-6735]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The rate of change in atmospheric CO2 is significantly affected by the terrestrial carbon sink, but the size and spatial distribution of this sink, and the extent to which it can be enhanced to mitigate climate change are highly uncertain. We combined carbon stock (CS) and eddy covariance (EC) flux measurements that were collected over a period of 15 years (2001-2016) in a 55 year old 30 km(2) pine forest growing at the semiarid timberline (with no irrigating or fertilization). The objective was to constrain estimates of the carbon (C) storage potential in forest plantations in such semiarid lands, which cover 18% of the global land area. The forest accumulated 145-160 g C m(-2) year(-1) over the study period based on the EC and CS approaches, with a mean value of 152.5 +/- 30.1 g C m(-2) year(-1) indicating 20% uncertainty in carbon uptake estimates. Current total stocks are estimated at 7,943 +/- 323 g C/m(2) and 372 g N/m(2). Carbon accumulated mostly in the soil (71% and 29% for soil and standing biomass carbon, respectively) with long soil carbon turnover time (59 years). Regardless of unexpected disturbances beyond those already observed at the study site, the results support a considerable carbon sink potential in semiarid soils and forest plantations, and imply that afforestation of even 10% of semiarid land area under conditions similar to that of the study site, could sequester 0.4 Pg C/year over several decades.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available