4.7 Article

Prediction of soil organic matter using multi-temporal satellite images in the Songnen Plain, China

Journal

GEODERMA
Volume 356, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.113896

Keywords

Soil organic matter; MODIS; Temporal information; Spectral index; Optimal input variables

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41501357, 41671438]
  2. Talent Recruitment Project of Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Due to confounding factors such as crop residue and soil moisture, soil organic matter (SOM) is usually estimated from soil samples in a laboratory or in the field at a local scale. In this study, laboratory and field data of crop residue, soil moisture, crop management practices, and SOM content were used in concert with multi-temporal MODIS images captured during bare soil periods over three years to construct spectral indices, which were then used as input variables to build a regional-scale SOM prediction model. Results showed that: (1) multi-temporal satellite images can be used to predict SOM content at a regional scale; (2) crop residue cover and time interval between snow melt, rainfall, and ploughing determined the optimal input variables for SOM prediction; (3) compared to a SOM model based on a single image, a multi-temporal model reduced the influence of soil moisture and improved both the stability and the accuracy of SOM prediction; (4) the best models generally used the ratio of MODIS Band 6 and Band 1 (R-61) as an input variable, as R-61 showed good correlation with SOM and less correlation with moisture; and (5) comparing different models in different years showed that models performed better in years with less crop residue. The study results can be used to improve the accuracy of quantitative estimates of the soil organic carbon pool and provide assistance in digital soil mapping.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available