4.7 Article

Gene Ontology semantic similarity tools: survey on features and challenges for biological knowledge discovery

Journal

BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages 886-901

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbw067

Keywords

gene ontology; semantic similarity tools; protein functional similarity; protein functional analysis; Gene Ontology annotations

Funding

  1. South Africa National Research Foundation (NRF)
  2. Government of Canada via the International Development Research Centre (IDRC) through the African Institute for Mathematical Sciences-Next Einstein Initiative (AIMS-NEI)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gene Ontology (GO) semantic similarity tools enable retrieval of semantic similarity scores, which incorporate biological knowledge embedded in the GO structure for comparing or classifying different proteins or list of proteins based on their GO annotations. This facilitates a better understanding of biological phenomena underlying the corresponding experiment and enables the identification of processes pertinent to different biological conditions. Currently, about 14 tools are available, whichmay play an important role in improving protein analyses at the functional level using different GO semantic similaritymeasures. Here we survey these tools to provide a comprehensive view of the challenges and advancesmade in this area to avoid redundant effort in developing features that already exist, or implementing ideas already proven to be obsolete in the context of GO. This helps researchers, tool developers, as well as end users, understand the underlying semantic similaritymeasures implemented through knowledge of pertinent features of, and issues related to, a particular tool. This should empower users to make appropriate choices for their biological applications and ensure effective knowledge discovery based on GO annotations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available