4.7 Article

Traffic-related air pollutants (TRAP-PM) promote neuronal amyloidogenesis through oxidative damage to lipid rafts

Journal

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
Volume 147, Issue -, Pages 242-251

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2019.12.023

Keywords

A beta; Lipid raft; Oxidative stress; Air pollutant; Alzheimer's disease; N-acetyl-cysteine (NAC)

Funding

  1. Cure Alzheimer's Fund
  2. National Institute on Aging [R21AG050201, R01AG051521, P50AG05142-31]
  3. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) [ES023864]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Traffic-related air pollution particulate matter (TRAP-PM) is associated with increased risk of Alzheimer Disease (AD). Rodent models respond to nano-sized TRAP-PM (nPM) with increased production of amyloid A beta peptides, concurrently with oxidative damage. Because pro-A beta processing of the amyloid precursor protein (APP) occurs on subcellular lipid rafts, we hypothesized that oxidative stress from nPM exposure would alter lipid rafts to favor A beta production. This hypothesis was tested with J20 mice and N2a cells transgenic for hAPPswe (familial AD). Exposure of J20-APPswe mice to nPM for 150 h caused increased lipid oxidation (4-HNE) and increased the pro-amyloidogenic processing of APP in lipid raft fractions in cerebral cortex; the absence of these changes in cerebellum parallels the AD brain region selectivity for A beta deposits. In vitro, nPM induced similar oxidative responses in N2a-APPswe cells, with dose-dependent production of NO, oxidative damage (4-HNE, 3NT), and lipid raft alterations of APP with increased A beta peptides. The antioxidant N-acetyl-cysteine (NAC) attenuated nPM-induced oxidative damage and lipid raft alterations of APP processing. These findings identify neuronal lipid rafts as novel targets of oxidative damage in the pro-amyloidogenic effects of air pollution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available