4.7 Review

Critical review on proteotypic peptide marker tracing for six allergenic ingredients in incurred foods by mass spectrometry

Journal

FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
Volume 128, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108747

Keywords

Food allergens; Mass spectrometry; Peptide markers; ThRAll; Incurred foods

Funding

  1. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) [GP/EFSA/AFSCO/2017/03]
  2. UK Food Standard Agency (FSA) [FS101206]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Peptide marker identification is one of the most important steps in the development of a mass spectrometry (MS) based method for allergen detection, since the robustness and sensitivity of the overall analytical method will strictly depend on the reliability of the proteotypic peptides tracing for each allergen. The European legislation in place issues the mandatory labelling of fourteen allergenic ingredients whenever used in different food formulations. Among these, six allergenic ingredients, namely milk, egg, peanut, soybean, hazelnut and almond, can be prioritized in light of their higher occurrence in food recalls for undeclared presence with serious risk decision. In this work, we described the results of a comprehensive evaluation of the current literature on MS-based allergen detection aiming at collecting all available information about proteins and peptide markers validated in independent studies for the six allergenic ingredients of interest. The main features of the targeted proteins were commented reviewing all details available about known isoforms and sequence homology particularly in plantderived allergens. Several critical aspects affecting peptide markers reliability were discussed and according to this evaluation a final short-list of candidate markers was compiled likely to be standardized and implemented in MS methods for allergen analysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available