4.7 Article

Identification and characterization of polyphenols in different varieties of Camellia oleifera seed cakes by UPLC-QTOF-MS

Journal

FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
Volume 126, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108614

Keywords

Camellia oleifera; Bioactive compounds; Phenolic compounds; Antioxidants; Health promoters

Funding

  1. Jiangnan University Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [JUSRP11845]
  2. National First-Class Discipline Program of Food Science and Technology [JUFSTR20180202]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31872895]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although camellia seed cakes are by-products of extracting oil from the seeds, they contain an abundant level of polyphenols, which are desirable compounds in human foods due to their antioxidant capacity. The object of this study was to detect polyphenols from three varieties of camellia seed cake by UPLC-QTOF-MS. In total, 73 unequivocal or tentative individual phenolic compounds were identified from methanol extracts of camellia seed cake, and the majority of phenolic compounds were in free form. Compared with other two varieties, more individual phenolic compounds were identified and characterized in Shucheng01 camellia seed cakes. In addition to flavonoid glycosides, numerous other polyphenols were identified in camellia seed cake, including phenolic acid and its derivatives, anthocyanins, and flavanones, the majority of which were first reported in the study of camellia seed cakes. Significant variations in individual polyphenol concentrations were found. The p-coumaric acid was the predominant free polyphenol in Shucheng01, while Luohan03 had the highest content of protocatechuic and 4-hydroxybenzoic acids. All results confirmed that camellia seed cakes are a rich source of various polyphenols, and their inclusion in the diet might provide health benefits.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available