4.8 Article

Granular activated carbon as nucleating agent for aerobic sludge granulation: Effect of GAC size on velocity field differences (GAC versus flocs) and aggregation behavior

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 198, Issue -, Pages 358-363

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.08.155

Keywords

Aerobic granular sludge; Flocs-GAC coaggregation; Hydraulic analysis; Granular activated carbon (GAC); Nucleating agent

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51478416]
  2. National Key Technologies Research and Development Program of China [2013BAC16B04]
  3. Public Projects of Zhejiang Province [2014C33017]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LY13E080003]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Initial cell aggregation plays an important role in the formation of aerobic granules. In this study, three parallel aerobic granular sludge reactors treating low-strength wastewater were established using granular activated carbon (GAC) of different sizes as the nucleating agent. A novel visual quantitative evaluation method was used to discern how GAC size affects velocity field differences (GAC versus flocs) and aggregation behavior during sludge granulation. Results showed that sludge granulation was significantly enhanced by addition of 0.2 mm GAC. However, there was no obvious improvement in granulation in reactor amended with 0.6 mm GAC. Hydraulic analysis revealed that increase of GAC size enhanced the velocity field difference between flocs and GAC, which decreased the lifecycle and fraction of flocs-GAC aggregates. Overall, based on analysis of aggregation behavior, GAC of suitable sizes (0.2 mm) can serve as the nucleating agent to accelerate flocs-GAC coaggregation and formation of aerobic granules. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available