4.7 Article

Loss of CD36 impairs hepatic insulin signaling by enhancing the interaction of PTP1B with IR

Journal

FASEB JOURNAL
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages 5658-5672

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1096/fj.201902777RR

Keywords

CD36; ER stress; insulin sensitivity; IR; PTP1B

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81873569, 31571210, 81400786]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFC1312700]
  3. Science and Technology Research Program of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission [KJZD-K201800401]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A contradictory role of CD36 in insulin resistance was found to be related to the nutrient state. Here, we examined that the physiological functions of CD36 in insulin signal transduction in mice fed a low-fat diet. CD36 deficiency led to hepatic insulin resistance and decreased insulin-stimulated tyrosine phosphorylation of insulin receptor beta (IR beta) in mice fed a low-fat diet. The ability of insulin to bind with IR did not differ between WT and CD36-deficient hepatocytes. CD36 formed a complex with IR beta and dissociation of CD36/Fyn complex or inhibition of Fyn only partially reversed the effects of CD36 on hepatic insulin signaling. Furthermore, we found that CD36 deficiency led to abnormally increased hepatic protein-tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B) expression and enhanced PTP1B and IR interactions, which contributed to the decreased insulin signaling and disordered glucose metabolism. In addition, increased endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress was found in the livers of the CD36-deficient mice, while inhibited ER stress normalized the PTP1B expression and restored insulin signaling in the CD36-deficient mice. Our findings suggest that the loss of CD36 impairs hepatic insulin signaling by enhancing the PTP1B/IR interaction that is induced by ER stress, indicating a possible critical step in the progression of hepatic insulin resistance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available