4.5 Article

Incremental Hole Drilling Residual Stress Measurement in Thin Aluminum Alloy Plates Subjected to Laser Shock Peening

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS
Volume 60, Issue 4, Pages 553-564

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11340-020-00586-5

Keywords

Residual stress; Hole drilling method; Thin plates; laser shock peening; X-ray diffraction; Neutron diffraction; Energy dispersive synchrotron X-ray diffraction

Funding

  1. DSI-NRF Centre of Excellence in Strong Materials (CoE-SM)
  2. Department of Science and Innovation (DSI)
  3. National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa through the Incentive Funding for Rated Researchers (IFRR), Equipment-Related Travel and Training Grant (ERTTG) [109200, 115195]
  4. National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa under the Competitive Programme for Rated Researchers [106036]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The American standard ASTM E837 presents a standard procedure to determine residual stresses in isotropic materials using the incremental hole drilling technique (IHD). The standard, however, presents limitations regarding its applicability, such as those related with the thin thickness of the samples. According to this standard, in depth non uniform residual stresses can only be determined, roughly, in plates where the thickness is greater than the mean diameter of the strain gage rosette used. This limitation excludes important experimental cases and, therefore, deserves to be investigated. In this work this limitation is numerically and experimentally investigated in detail, considering the case of residual stresses induced by laser shock peening (LSP) in aluminum alloy 7075-T651 plates. The obtained results using the incremental hole drilling technique (IHD), based on the integral method, are benchmarked against the results of several diffraction techniques, used as reference, and a procedure to correct the experimentally determined strain-depth relaxation curves, to accurately still apply the ASTM E837 standard procedure is discussed and validated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available