4.7 Article

Prediction of axillary response by monitoring with ultrasound and MRI during and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients

Journal

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages 1460-1469

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06539-4

Keywords

Breast cancer; Lymph nodes; Ultrasound; Magnetic resonance imaging; Neoadjuvant therapy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose To investigate whether monitoring with ultrasound and MR imaging before, during and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) can predict axillary response in breast cancer patients. Materials and methods A total of 131 breast cancer patients with clinically positive axillary lymph node (LN) who underwent NAC and subsequent surgery were enrolled. They had ultrasound and 3.0 T-MR examinations before, during and after NAC. After reviewing ultrasound and MR images, axillary LN features and tumour size (T size) were noted. According to LN status after surgery, imaging features and their diagnostic performances were analysed. Results Of the 131 patients, 60 (45.8%) had positive LNs after surgery. Pre-NAC T size at ultrasound and MR was different in positive LN status after surgery (p < 0.01). There were significant differences in mid- and post-NAC number, cortical thickness (CxT), T size and T size reduction at ultrasound and mid- and post-NAC CxT, hilum, T size and T size reduction, and post-NAC ratio of diameter at MR (p < 0.03). On multivariate analysis, pre-NAC MR T size (OR, 1.03), mid-NAC ultrasound T size (OR, 1.05) and CxT (OR, 1.53), and post-NAC MR T size (OR, 1.06) and CxT (OR, 1.64) were independently associated with positive LN (p < 0.004). Combined mid-NAC ultrasound T size and CxT showed the best diagnostic performance with AUC of 0.760. Conclusion Monitoring ultrasound and MR axillary LNs and T size can be useful to predict axillary response to NAC in breast cancer patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available