3.8 Article

Influence of river discharge on phytoplankton structure and nutrient concentrations in four tropical semiarid estuaries

Journal

BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF OCEANOGRAPHY
Volume 64, Issue 1, Pages 37-48

Publisher

INST OCEANOGRAFICO, UNIV SAO PAULO
DOI: 10.1590/S1679-87592016101406401

Keywords

Nitrogen; Phosphorous; Freshwater flow; Eutrophication; Hypersalinity

Funding

  1. CNPq [558188/2009-5]
  2. CAPES [0532/2009]
  3. Fundacao Cearense de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (FUNCAP)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated changes in phytoplankton and nutrients after an increase in river discharge in four estuaries of northeastern Brazil. Samples were taken during a markedly freshwater-deprived period (Nov/2010, dry season), and during a rainy season (May/2011). While two estuaries are located in urban areas (Ceara - CE and Coco - CO), the others are markedly freshwater-deprived (Pacoti - PAC and Pirangi - PIR). Our findings indicate that increased freshwater had opposing effects on estuaries impacted by anthropogenic discharges (CO, CE and PIR) compared with the other, less impacted (PAC). In CO and CE, the freshwater flow during the rainy period had a nutrient diluting effect and controlled phytoplankton blooms. In PIR, only phosphorus and inorganic nitrogen decreased in the rainy season. In contrast, an increase of all nutrients was observed in PAC, and of TN in PIR, followed by an increase in phytoplankton biomass. In the rainy season, eutrophic freshwater species dominated in all the estuaries. In the dry season, blooms of Cryptomonas/Rhodomonas and Synechocystis aquatilis were, respectively, observed in CE and CO. Also in the dry season, PAC and PIR had a predominance of marine species under a condition of hypersalinity. Canonical correspondence analysis suggested the variation observed for salinity, silica, and TN are the main driver of phytoplankton structure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available