4.7 Article

Molecular modelling of epitopes recognized by neoplastic B lymphocytes in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 185, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2019.111838

Keywords

CLL; B cell receptor; Phage display; Peptides; GRID-Pharmacophore; LB-3D-QSAR

Funding

  1. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro [IG-2012-13388]
  2. Ministero della Salute [RF-2010-2306943]
  3. PRIN project [2012CK5RPF, 2012CK5RPF_002, 201744BN5T]
  4. POR FES/FESR 2014-20-AM ALCMEONE [cup J18C17000610006]
  5. Fondazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (FIRC) fellowship
  6. EU project PON-RI2014-2020

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Identification of epitopes recognized by tumour B cells could provide insights into the molecular mechanisms of B cell tumorigenesis through aberrant B cell receptor (BCR) signalling. Here, we analysed the structure of eleven peptides binders of BCRs expressed in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) patients in order to identify the chemical features required for cross-reactive binding to different CLL clonotypes. Four cross-reactive (CR) and seven no-cross-reactive (NCR) peptides were analysed by means of GRID molecular interaction fields, ligand-based pharmacophore and 3D-QSAR approaches. Based on pharmacophore model, two peptides were generated by specific amino acids substitutions of the parental NCR peptides; these new peptides resumed the common chemical features of CR peptides and bound the CLL BCR clonotypes recognized by CR peptides and parental NCR peptides. Thus, our computational approach guided the pharmacophore modelling of CR peptides. In perspective, peptide binders of CLL BCR clonotypes could represent a powerful tool for computational modelling of epitopes recognized by tumour B cells clones. (C) 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available