4.5 Review

Effectiveness of current psychological interventions to improve emotion regulation in youth: a meta-analysis

Journal

EUROPEAN CHILD & ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY
Volume 30, Issue 6, Pages 829-848

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00787-020-01498-4

Keywords

Emotion regulation; Psychopathology; Youth mental health; Meta-analysis; Psychological intervention

Funding

  1. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie Grant [722561]
  2. ESRC [ES/M001660/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This meta-analysis summarized the effectiveness of existing interventions to improve emotion regulation (ER) in youth, finding that interventions can enhance ER and these improvements are correlated with improvements in psychopathology. However, significant differences between studies including intervention components, ER measures, and populations studied resulted in large heterogeneity. More research with larger sample sizes, different age groups, and psychopathologies are necessary to further understand the efficacy of interventions for different individuals and contexts.
Background Research investigating the role of emotion regulation (ER) in the development and treatment of psychopathology has increased in recent years. Evidence suggests that an increased focus on ER in treatment can improve existing interventions. Most ER research has neglected young people, therefore the present meta-analysis summarizes the evidence for existing psychosocial intervention and their effectiveness to improve ER in youth. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Twenty-one randomized-control-trials (RCTs) assessed changes in ER following a psychological intervention in youth exhibiting various psychopathological symptoms. We found moderate effect sizes for current interventions to decrease emotion dysregulation in youth (g = - 0.46) and small effect sizes to improve emotion regulation (g = 0.36). Significant differences between studies including intervention components, ER measures and populations studied resulted in large heterogeneity. This is the first meta-analysis that summarizes the effectiveness for existing interventions to improve ER in youth. The results suggest that interventions can enhance ER in youth, and that these improvements correlate with improvements in psychopathology. More RCTs including larger sample sizes, different age groups and psychopathologies are needed to increase our understanding of what works for who and when.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available