4.7 Article

Influence of particle size distribution on anaerobic degradation of phenol and analysis of methanogenic microbial community

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
Volume 27, Issue 10, Pages 10391-10403

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-07665-z

Keywords

Anaerobic digestion; Phenol degradation; Particle size distribution; Phenol-degrading sludge; Methanogenic activity; Microbial community structure

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51878232] Funding Source: Medline
  2. University of Science and Technology of China [KF201702] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sludge morphology considerably affects the mechanism underlying microbial anaerobic degradation of phenol. Here, we assessed the phenol degradation rate, specific methanogenic activity, electron transport activity, coenzyme F-420 concentration, and microbial community structure of five phenol-degrading sludge of varying particle sizes (i.e., < 20, 20-50, 50-100, 100-200, and > 200 mu m). The results indicated an increase in phenol degradation rate and microbial community structure that distinctly correlated with an increase in sludge particle size. Although the sludge with the smallest particle size (< 20 mu m) showed the lowest phenol degradation rate (9.3 mg COD center dot gVSS(-1) day(-1)), its methanogenic activity with propionic acid, butyric acid, and H-2/CO2 as substrates was the best, and the concentration of coenzyme F-420 was the highest. The small particle size sludge did not contain abundant syntrophic bacteria or hydrogenotrophic methanogens, but contained abundant acetoclastic methanogens. Moreover, the floc sizes of the different sludge varied in important phenol-degrading bacteria and archaea, which may dominate the synergistic mechanism. This study provides a new perspective on the role of sludge floc size on the anaerobic digestion of phenol.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available