4.8 Article

Perspectives on Cobalt Supply through 2030 in the Face of Changing Demand

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 54, Issue 5, Pages 2985-2993

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b04975

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF), through CBET awards [1454166, 1254688, 1605050]
  2. MRSEC Program of the National Science Foundation [DMR-1419807]
  3. Vehicle Technologies Office, U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  4. Directorate For Engineering
  5. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1454166, 1605050] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  7. Directorate For Engineering [1254688] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lithium-ion battery demand, particularly for electric vehicles, is projected to increase by over 300% throughout the next decade. With these expected increases in demand, cobalt (Co)-dependent technologies face the risk of 52 significant impact from supply concentration and mining limitations in the short term. Increased extraction and secondary recovery form the basis of modeling scenarios that examine implications on Co supply to 2030. Demand for Co is estimated to range from 235 to 430 ktonnes in 2030. This upper bound on Co demand in 2030 corresponds to 280% of world refinery capacity in 2016. Supply from scheduled and unscheduled production as well as secondary production is estimated to range from 320 to 460 ktonnes. Our analysis suggests the following: (1) Co price will remain relatively stable in the short term, given that this range suggests even a supply surplus, (2) future Co supply will become more diversified geographically and mined more as a byproduct of nickel (Ni) over this period, and (3) for this demand to be met, attention should be paid to sustained investments in refined supply of Co and secondary recovery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available