4.8 Article

Untargeted Metabolic Pathway Analysis as an Effective Strategy to Connect Various Nanoparticle Properties to Nanoparticle-Induced Ecotoxicity

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 54, Issue 6, Pages 3395-3406

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b06096

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21722703, 31770550]
  2. 111 program [T2017002]
  3. Tianjin Natural Science Foundation [18JCYBJC23600, 19JCJQJC62500]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Elucidation of the relationships between nanoparticle properties and ecotoxicity is a fundamental issue for environmental applications and risk assessment of nanoparticles. However, effective strategies to connect the various properties of nanoparticles with their ecotoxicity remain largely unavailable. Herein, an untargeted metabolic pathway analysis was employed to investigate the environmental risk posed by 10 typical nanoparticles (AgNPs, CuNPs, FeNPs, ZnONPs, SiO(2)NPs, TiO(2)NPs, GO, GOQDs, SWCNTs, and C-60) to rice (a staple food for half of the world's population). Downregulation of carbohydrate metabolism and upregulation of amino acid metabolism were the two dominant metabolic effects induced by all tested nanoparticles. Partial least-squares regression analysis indicated that a zerovalent metal and high specific surface area positively contributed to the down- regulation of carbohydrate metabolism, indicating strong abiotic stress. In contrast, the carbon type, the presence of a spherical or sheet shape, and the absence of oxygen functional groups in the nanoparticles positively contributed to the upregulation of amino acid metabolism, indicating adaptation to abiotic stress. Moreover, network relationships among five properties of nanoparticles were established for these metabolic pathways. The results of the present study will aid in the understanding and prediction of environmental risks and in the design of environmentally friendly nanoparticles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available