4.8 Article

Occupational Inhalation Exposures to Nanoparticles at Six Singapore Printing Centers

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 54, Issue 4, Pages 2389-2400

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b06984

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Nanyang Technological University -Harvard School of Public Health Initiative for Sustainable Nanotechnology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Laser printers emit high levels of nanoparticles (PM0.1) during operation. Although it is well established that toners contain multiple engineered nanomaterials (ENMs), little is known about inhalation exposures to these nanoparticles and work practices in printing centers. In this report, we present a comprehensive inhalation exposure assessment of indoor micro environments at six commercial printing centers in Singapore, the first such assessment outside of the United States, using real-time personal and stationary monitors, time-integrated instrumentation, and multiple analytical methods. Extensive presence of ENMs, including titanium dioxide, iron oxide, and silica, was detected in toners and in airborne particles collected from all six centers studied. We document high transient exposures to emitted nanoparticles (peaks of similar to 500 000 particles/cm(3), lung-deposited surface area of up to 220 mu m(2)/cm(3), and PM0.1 up to 16 mu g/m(3)) with complex PM0.1 chemistry that included 40-60 wt % organic carbon, 10-15 wt % elemental carbon, and 14 wt % trace elements. We also record 271.6-474.9 pmol/mg of Environmental Protection Agency-priority polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. These findings highlight the potentially high occupational inhalation exposures to nanoparticles with complex compositions resulting from widespread usage of nano-enabled toners in the printing industry, as well as inadequate ENM-specific exposure control measures in these settings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available