4.8 Article

Impacts of Oil Spills on Arctic Marine Ecosystems: A Quantitative and Probabilistic Risk Assessment Perspective

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 54, Issue 4, Pages 2112-2121

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b07086

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Lloyd's Register Foundation [28/5/2013]
  2. LRF
  3. Helsinki Institute of Sustainability Science (HELSUS)
  4. GENICE project (Microbial Genomics for Oil Spill Preparedness in Canada's Arctic Marine Environment)
  5. Academy of Finland [304531, 317255]
  6. University of Helsinki research funds
  7. Academy of Finland (AKA) [317255, 304531, 317255, 304531] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Oil spills resulting from maritime accidents pose a poorly understood risk to the Arctic environment. We propose a novel probabilistic method to quantitatively assess these risks. Our method accounts for spatiotemporally varying population distributions, the spreading of oil, and seasonally varying species-specific exposure potential and sensitivity to oil. It quantifies risk with explicit uncertainty estimates, enables one to compare risks over large geographic areas, and produces information on a meaningful scale for decision-making. We demonstrate the method by assessing the short-term risks oil spills pose to polar bears, ringed seals, and walrus in the Kara Sea, the western part of the Northern Sea Route. The risks differ considerably between species, spatial locations, and seasons. Our results support current aspirations to ban heavy fuel oil in the Arctic but show that we should not underestimate the risks of lighter oils either, as these oils can pollute larger areas than heavier ones. Our results also highlight the importance of spatially explicit season-specific oil spill risk assessment in the Arctic and that environmental variability and the lack of data are a major source of uncertainty related to the oil spill impacts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available