4.5 Article

Assessment of heavy metal contamination in natural waters of Dereli, Giresun: an area containing mineral deposits in northeastern Turkey

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT
Volume 192, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-019-8057-0

Keywords

Heavy metal; Contamination; Natural water; Mineralization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The concentration of heavy metals in the natural waters of the area surrounding Dereli (Giresun), a mineralized area, was determined. In addition, the physicochemical parameters (such as pH, Eh, and HCO3-) influencing the concentration of dissolved metals in waters were evaluated. Samples were collected from stream, spring, and main river waters, some of which are used by local residents for drinking, fish farming, and animal husbandry. The present data indicate that the water-rock interaction is the main process controlling the chemical composition of waters in the area. The waters are predominantly CaMgHCO3-type waters with alkaline pH values. Heavy metal concentrations (Pb, Zn, Cu, Fe, Mn, U, Cd, As, Hg, Sb, Ni, Co, and Ba) in waters were generally low. Relatively high values of certain metals were determined in waters of the Kotana and Kurtulmus sites of Dereli. The levels of Pb in the river, stream, and spring water samples in these sites were somewhat higher than the Pb values reported in the literature for natural waters. However, these values only slightly exceeded the Pb water limit values proposed by the USEPA and the WHO. In addition, the concentrations of other heavy metals, except Pb, were fairly similar to those of other natural waters and these values were also under the drinking water limits set by the WHO and the USEPA. This study shows that waters in the area of Dereli were not significantly affected by mineralization. This is most likely caused by the bicarbonate-rich waters affecting the dissolved metal concentrations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available