4.7 Article

Benchmarking the PAWN distribution-based method against the variance-based method in global sensitivity analysis: Empirical results

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE
Volume 122, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.104556

Keywords

Global sensitivity analysis; PAWN distribution-based method; Variance-based sensitivity analysis

Funding

  1. EDF Energy R&D UK at the Industrial Doctoral Centre for Offshore Renewable Energy (IDCORE), a consortium of the University of Exeter
  2. University of Edinburgh
  3. University of Strathclyde
  4. Energy Technologies Institute
  5. Research Councils Energy Programme [EP/J500847/1]
  6. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/P001173/1]
  7. EPSRC [EP/P001173/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The search for new and more efficient global sensitivity analysis methods has led to the development of the PAWN distribution-based method. This method has been proven to overcome one of the main limitation of variance-based methods - the moment independent property. In this regard, the distribution-based method has outperformed the variance-based method for some highly-skewed or multi-modal distributions. However, despite its increasing popularity, there is a lack of understanding about the performance and properties of the distribution-based method. The benchmark presented in this paper is an attempt to remedy this. We compare the distribution-based method against the variance-based method for a set of well-known test functions. We show that, whereas the distribution-based method can be used as a complementary approach to variance-based methods, which is especially useful when dealing with highly-skewed or multi-modal distributions, it fails to rank different inputs that have different orders of magnitude in their contribution of the response.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available