4.8 Article

Atmospheric microplastic deposition in an urban environment and an evaluation of transport

Journal

ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL
Volume 136, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105411

Keywords

Microplastics; Atmospheric deposition; Air pollution; Urban

Funding

  1. Leonardo Office Brandenburg (Erasmus+programme)
  2. BAfoG (Federal Law on Support for Education and Training) student loans and grants programme, Hannover, Germany
  3. Medical Research Council, UK (MRC) [MR/R026521/1]
  4. MRC [MR/S020810/2, MR/S020810/1, MR/M501669/1, MR/R026521/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. NERC [NE/N007018/1, NE/S006729/2, NE/S006729/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microplastics are a global environmental issue contaminating aquatic and terrestrial environments. They have been reported in atmospheric deposition, and indoor and outdoor air, raising concern for public health due to the potential for exposure. Moreover, the atmosphere presents a new vehicle for microplastics to enter the wider environment, yet our knowledge of the quantities, characteristics and pathways of airborne microplastics is sparse. Here we show microplastics in atmospheric deposition in a major population centre, central London. Microplastics were found in all samples, with deposition rates ranging from 575 to 1008 microplastics/m(2)/d. They were found in various shapes, of which fibrous microplastics accounted for the great majority (92%). Across all samples, 15 different petrochemical-based polymers were identified. Bivariate polar plots indicated dependency on wind, with different source areas for fibrous and non-fibrous airborne microplastics. This is the first evidence of airborne microplastics in London and confirms the need to include airborne pathways when consolidating microplastic impacts on the wider environment and human health.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available