4.7 Article

Optimization of reactants relative humidity for high performance of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells with co-flow and counter-flow configurations

Journal

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 205, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2019.112369

Keywords

PEM fuel cell; Water management; Relative humidity; Co-flow and counter-flow configurations; Cell performance

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51806153]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFE0118600]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A three-dimensional multiphase polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) fuel cell model is employed to investigate the membrane and liquid water transport property as well as cell performance with the co-flow and counter-flow configurations under different reactant relative humidity (RH) conditions. Numerical results indicate that a lower anode RH with a cathode RH of 100% or a lower cathode RH with an anode RH of 100% leads to a decrement in cell performance at high operational voltages and an increment in cell performance at low operational voltages. With moderate or high anode and cathode RH, the liquid water saturation in porous electrodes is the limiting factor in cell performance improvement; but with low anode and cathode RH, the membrane water content becomes the limiting factor. Moreover, the counter-flow configuration shows differences in the membrane and liquid water distributions in comparison with the co-flow configuration. This study also found that the counter-flow configuration with the anode and cathode RH of 50% greatly increases the current density by 21.21% compared with the co-flow configuration under the anode and cathode RH of 100% at the operational voltage of 0.4 V, therefore, the counter-flow configuration with moderate anode and cathode RH is recommended for the optimal operation of a parallel flow field PEM fuel cell.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available