4.7 Article

Comprehensive Kinetic Modeling Study of CO2 Gasification of Char Derived from Food Waste

Journal

ENERGY & FUELS
Volume 34, Issue 2, Pages 1883-1895

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b03937

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Majlis Amanah Rakyat (MARA)
  2. University of Glasgow

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chemical kinetics for char originating from biomass devolatization are the essential requirements for studying the thermochemical processes of gasification. While the char kinetics for typical biomass and coal feedstocks are widely available in the literature, the gasification kinetics of char produced from food waste (FW) in CO2 environment are still unknown. Further, the chemical compositions of char and FW are significantly different than those from woody biomass and coal. To address this, an in-depth kinetic study for the CO2 gasification of FW char is presented in this paper. FW is initially pyrolyzed at 800 degrees C, and the char sample is sieved in the range of 53-100 pm before being gasified in a thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA) under CO2 atmosphere at 850, 900, and 950 degrees C. The experimental results show that the char conversion rate increases with the reaction times and temperature. Using the TGA data, three different kinetic models, namely, volumetric model (VM), shrinking core model (SCM), and random pore model (RPM), are developed, and their effectiveness is thoroughly investigated. In comparison with the experimental results, SCM shows a high regression at 850 degrees C, while RPM shows a high regression at 900 and 950 degrees C. A power law (PL) model is also introduced, and it demonstrates that its regression is higher than 99% at every gasification temperature investigated. Therefore, the PL model most precisely predicts the gasification kinetics, which also agrees well with the RPM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available