4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Modelling and flexible predictive control of buildings space-heating demand in district heating systems

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 188, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.116042

Keywords

Mixed-integer linear program; Model predictive control; Reduced order building model; Lumped capacitance model; Parameters identification; Building thermal dynamic simulation

Funding

  1. ADEME (Agence de l'Environnement et de la Maltrise de l'Energie)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents and demonstrates, by numerical simulation, a Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP)-based Model Predictive Control (MPC) strategy for space-heating demand in buildings connected to a district heating system. The proposed MPC deals with space-heating demand with extended flexibility. It exploits thermal inertia, inherently present in the building and its heating system, to optimally plan space-heating load in anticipation of weather conditions and energy cost variations. MPC is based on a reliable Reduced-Order Model (ROM). Heating circuit and internal mass are carefully modelled within the ROM structure since these elements can be used for short-term heat storage and therefore play an important role in demand-side management. As for the model parameters identification, training data is restricted to non-intrusive, easily accessible measurements available at the substation level. The model identification approach and control strategy are applied to a well-insulated radiator-heated case-study building simulator developed in Modelica. Results show that the proposed ROM is reliable enough for an MPC application. Compared to conventional weather-compensation control, flexible MILP-based MPC proved to be cost-efficient, while preserving a decent indoor thermal comfort level. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available