4.5 Article

A Classification Method for Transmission Line Icing Process Curve Based on Hierarchical K-Means Clustering

Journal

ENERGIES
Volume 12, Issue 24, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en12244786

Keywords

icing process; classification; icing evolution curves; K-means clustering; centroid; characteristic parameter; icing forecasting

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1766220]
  2. State Grid Corporation [U1766220]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2019MS019]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China [2019A1515012122]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Icing forecasting for transmission lines is of great significance for anti-icing strategies in power grids, but existing prediction models have some disadvantages such as application limitations, weak generalization, and lack of global prediction ability. To overcome these shortcomings, this paper suggests a new conception about a segmental icing prediction model for transmission lines in which the classification of icing process plays a crucial role. In order to obtain the classification, a hierarchical K-means clustering method is utilized and 11 characteristic parameters are proposed. Based on this method, 97 icing processes derived from the Icing Monitoring System in China Southern Power Grid are clustered into six categories according to their curve shape and the abstracted icing evolution curves are drawn based on the clustering centroid. Results show that the processes of ice events are probably different and the icing process can be considered as a combination of several segments and nodes, which reinforce the suggested conception of the segmental icing prediction model. Based on monitoring data and clustering, the obtained types of icing evolution are more comprehensive and specific, and the work lays the foundation for the model construction and contributes to other fields.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available