4.6 Article

A cost-benefit analysis of V2G electric vehicles supporting peak shaving in Shanghai

Journal

ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH
Volume 179, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2019.106058

Keywords

Vehicle to grid (V2G); Energy storage; Peak shaving; Cost-benefit analysis

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai, China [17ZR1411200]
  2. Global Environment Facility, China [150157]
  3. Alliance Plan of Shanghai Municipal Promotion Association for Transformation of Scientific and Technological Achievements, China [LM201906]
  4. Social Science Programs of the Education Ministry, China [16YJAZH035]
  5. State Grid Science and Technology Project, China [520940170022]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The costs and benefits of the participants including electric vehicle users, power grid companies and power plants were analyzed when four brands of electric vehicles participated in V2G peak shaving service in Shanghai. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to determine the key parameters that affected the costs and benefits of electric vehicle users and power grid companies. The results show that the total net profit of V2G services is greater than zero under the appropriate set of parameters. The net incomes of electric vehicles users are greater than zero in V2G peak shaving services when the peak price of electricity fed into the grid is more than three times the valley price. The lower the cost of electric vehicle battery, the more the net income of single user. The net incomes of power grid companies are always very negative and the higher the peak shaving load, the greater the net loss of the power company. The benefits of power plants are the biggest among three participants and are far greater than those of electric vehicle users. A fair market distribution mechanism of V2G profits should be built among three participants in order to promote the healthy development of V2G applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available