4.5 Article

Patients' perspectives after switching from infliximab to biosimilar CT-P13 in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A 12-month prospective cohort study

Journal

DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE
Volume 51, Issue 12, Pages 1652-1660

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2019.08.020

Keywords

Biosimilar; Crohn's disease; CT-P13; Inflammatory bowel disease; Infliximab; Ulcerative colitis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Patients' perspectives after switching from infliximab to a biosimilar have yet to be assessed. Aim: To assess patients' perspectives in a prospective manner after switching from infliximab to CT-P13. Methods: 113 consecutive patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) on maintenance therapy with infliximab were switched to CT-P13. Patients' perspectives were assessed by questionnaires, including the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) and FACIT-F (questionnaire regarding fatigue), and patient-reported outcomes (IBD disability index) at the inclusion and after the fourth CT-P13 infusion. Results: After one year, the patients' perspectives did not change after the switch according to BMQ-general, BMQ-specific necessity and BMQ-specific concerns subscales. No difference was observed in the mean IBD-DI score, while a significant improvement in fatigue was observed according to the FACIT-F questionnaire. Patients' concerns were raised about the use of biosimilars and the risks of switching with a significant improvement after switching (65% vs. 42%, respectively, p = 0.01). Fourteen (12.4%) patients experienced loss of response to CT-P13, including 12 with restoration of steroid-free clinical remission after CT-P13 dose optimization. Conclusion: Although some concerns were reported, no difference was observed in patients' perspectives after switching from infliximab to CT-P13. (c) 2019 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available