4.1 Review

Role of TFF3 as an adjunct in the diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus using a minimally invasive esophageal sampling device-The Cytosponge

Journal

DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY
Volume 48, Issue 3, Pages 253-264

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/dc.24354

Keywords

Barrett's esophagus; biomarkers; esophageal adenocarcinoma; screening

Funding

  1. Cancer Research UK
  2. Medical Research Council
  3. MRC [MC_UU_12022/2] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The incidence of esophageal carcinoma continues to increase whilst its prognosis remains poor. The most dramatic reduction in mortality is likely to follow early diagnosis of the preinvasive precursor lesion, Barrett's esophagus (BE), coupled with treatment of dysplastic lesions. The major risk factor for BE is gastroesophageal reflux disease, however this is highly prevalent and only a small proportion of individuals have BE, therefore an endoscopy-based screening strategy to detect BE is unfeasible. Minimally invasive esophageal sampling devices offer an alternative, cost-effective strategy which can be deployed within an at-risk population in a primary care setting to identify individuals with probable BE who can then be referred for endoscopic confirmation. The device that has currently progressed furthest in clinical trials is the Cytosponge(TM) which collects cells from the gastric cardia, gastroesophageal junction and along the whole esophageal length. The cell sample is processed into a formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded block and sections assessed for the presence of intestinal metaplasia. TFF3 immunohistochemistry has consistently been shown to be a valuable adjunct that increases the accuracy of the Cytosponge test by highlighting early goblet cells which may be missed on morphological assessment and by allowing pseudogoblet cells to be differentiated from true goblet cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available