4.4 Article

The relationship between post-injury measures of cognition, balance, symptom reports and health-related quality-of-life in adolescent athletes with concussion

Journal

BRAIN INJURY
Volume 30, Issue 7, Pages 891-898

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/02699052.2016.1146960

Keywords

Brain injury; assessment; patient-reported outcome measures; paediatric

Funding

  1. National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment (NOCSAE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Little is known about the relationship between post-concussion impairments and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL). The primary purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between traditional concussion assessments and HRQoL in adolescent athletes post-concussion. The secondary purpose was to determine the association between HRQoL deficits and time lost. Methods: In total, 1134 athletes completed a baseline assessment battery. HRQoL measures included the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL), Multidimensional Fatigue Scale (MFS) and Headache Impact Test-6. In total, 122 athletes sustained a concussion and underwent follow-up testing at 3 and 10 days post-injury. Results: The strongest relationships were between symptom severity and HRQoL. For concurrent regression analyses at Day 3, PedsQL-Physical accounted for 17.9% of the variance in time lost beyond that accounted for by traditional measures. At Day 10, PedsQL-School accounted for 15.2% and symptom severity for 7.1% of this variance. In predictive analyses, at Day 3, PedsQL-Physical accounted for 3.9% and MFS-General for 3.3% of the variance in time lost beyond that accounted for by traditional measures. At Day 10, MFS-Cognitive accounted for 12.0% of this variance. Conclusions: HRQoL appears to play a role in time lost post-concussion and should be measured in combination with traditional concussion assessments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available