4.5 Review

The long road to the first FDA-approved gene therapy: chimeric antigen receptor T cells targeting CD19

Journal

CYTOTHERAPY
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages 57-69

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2019.12.004

Keywords

axicabtagene ciloleucel; CART; CART19; chimeric antigen receptor T cells; CTL019; tisagenlecleucel

Funding

  1. Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics
  2. ASH -Scholar Award
  3. National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute [1K99CA212302-01A1, R00CA212302-03]
  4. Mark Foundation
  5. Danish Cancer Society
  6. Dagmar Marshalls fond
  7. Fabrikant Einar Willumsens Mindelegat
  8. Kobenhavns Universitets krxftforsknings fond
  9. Fonden til fremme of klinisk cancer forskning
  10. Anders Hasselbalchs fond til leukxmiens bekxmpelse

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Thirty years after initial publications of the concept of a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR), the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy. Unlike other immunotherapies, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and bispecific antibodies, CAR T cells are unique as they are living drugs, that is, gene-edited killer cells that can recognize and kill cancer. During these 30 years of development, the CAR construct, T-cell manufacturing process, and clinical patient management have gone through rounds of failures and successes that drove continuous improvement. Tisagenlecleucel was the first gene therapy to receive approval from the FDA for any indication. The initial approval was for relapsed or refractory (r/r) pediatric and young-adult B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia in August 2017 and in May 2018 for adult r/r diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Here we review the preclinical and clinical development of what began as CART19 at the University of Pennsylvania and later developed into tisagenlecleucel. (C) 2019 International Society for Cell and Gene Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available