4.5 Review

Spanish Cell Therapy Network (TerCel): 15 years of successful collaborative translational research

Journal

CYTOTHERAPY
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages 1-5

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2019.11.001

Keywords

cell therapy; regenerative medicine; research network; stem cells; translational medicine

Funding

  1. Institute de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) [RD16/0011/0001]
  2. European Regional Development Fund A way to make Europe
  3. Takeda

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the current article we summarize the 15-year experience of the Spanish Cell Therapy Network (TerCel), a successful collaborative public initiative funded by the Spanish government for the support of nationwide translational research in this important area. Thirty-two research groups organized in three programs devoted to cardiovascular, neurodegenerative and immune-inflammatory diseases, respectively, currently form the network. Each program has three working packages focused on basic science, pre-clinical studies and clinical application. TerCel has contributed during this period to boost the translational research in cell therapy in Spain, setting up a network of Good Manufacturing Practicecertified cell manufacturing facilities and increasing the number of translational research projects, publications, patents and clinical trials of the participating groups, especially those in collaboration. TerCel pays particular attention to the public-private collaboration, which, for instance, has led to the development of the first allogeneic cell therapy product approved by the European Medicines Agency, Darvadstrocel. The current collaborative work is focused on the development of multicenter phase 2 and 3 trials that could translate these therapies to clinical practice for the benefit of patients. Crown Copyright (C) 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of International Society for Cell and Gene Therapy. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available