4.5 Article

Randomised trial of early neonatal hydrocortisone demonstrates potential undesired effects on neurodevelopment at preschool age

Journal

ACTA PAEDIATRICA
Volume 105, Issue 2, Pages 159-164

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/apa.13074

Keywords

Cerebral palsy; Growth; Hydrocortisone; Neurodevelopment; Post-natal corticosteroids

Categories

Funding

  1. Foundation for Paediatric Research
  2. Alma and K.A. Snellman Foundation (Oulu, Finland)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim: We evaluated the neurodevelopment and growth of five-to seven-year-old children who had participated in a randomised trial of early low-dose hydrocortisone treatment to prevent bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Methods: The 51 infants in the original study had birthweights of 501-1250 g and gestational ages of 23-30 weeks, required mechanical ventilation during the first 24 hours and received hydrocortisone or a placebo for 10 days. The majority (80%) of the 90% who survived to five-to seven years of age participated in this follow-up study and their growth, neuromotor, cognitive and speech development were evaluated. Results: Some neurodevelopment impairment was observed in 61% of the hydrocortisone group and 39% of the placebo group, ranging from minor neurological dysfunction to severe neurological conditions (p = 0.182). The mean full-scale intelligence quotient (IQ) was 87.8 (15.3) in the hydrocortisone group and 95.7 (15.0) in the placebo group (p = 0.135), and the mean performance IQ was 88.3 (14.5) and 99.1 (14.0) (p = 0.034), respectively. A fifth (22%) of the hydrocortisone group required physiotherapy, but none of the placebo group did (p = 0.034). The age-standardised growth was comparable between both groups. Conclusion: Early hydrocortisone treatment may have undesired effects on neurodevelopment at preschool age, and further safety studies are required.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available