4.5 Review

B cell targeted therapies in autoimmune disease

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 61, Issue -, Pages 92-99

Publisher

CURRENT BIOLOGY LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.coi.2019.09.004

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Rheumatology Research Foundation
  2. Alliance for Lupus Research
  3. Pfizer, Inc.
  4. Rosenfeld Professorship
  5. N.I.H. (National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Accelerating Medicines Partnership Grant) [NIAIDR01-M-077674, 1UH2-AR-067690, NIAMSR21AR071670]
  6. Bertha and Louis Weinstein Research Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review FDA-approved B cell-targeted therapy has expanded to a multitude of autoimmune diseases ranging from organ specific diseases, like pemphigus and multiple sclerosis, to systemic diseases such as ANCA-associated vasculitis, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). In this review, we discuss the variability in response to B cell-targeted therapies with a focus on the diversity of human B cells and plasma cells, and will discuss several of the promising new B cell-targeted therapies. Recent finding The pathogenic roles for B cells include autoantibody-dependent and autoantibody-independent functions whose importance may vary across diseases or even in subsets of patients with the same disease. Recent data have further demonstrated the diversity of human B cell subsets that contribute to disease as well as novel pathways of B cell activation in autoimmune disease. The importance of eliminating autoreactive B cells and plasma cells will be discussed, as well as new approaches to do so. Summary The past several years has witnessed significant advances in our knowledge of human B cell subsets and function. This has created a nuanced picture of the diverse ways B cells contribute to autoimmunity and an ever-expanding armamentarium of B cell-targeted therapies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available