4.3 Article

Tapentadol prolonged release for managing moderate to severe chronic neck pain with or without a neuropathic component

Journal

CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages 651-659

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2020.1722083

Keywords

Neck pain; tapentadol; pain; neuropathic pain; quality of life; range of motion; disability

Funding

  1. Grunenthal

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Despite the high prevalence of neck pain, few studies have addressed the pharmacological treatment of this condition. Purpose: We evaluated the effectiveness of tapentadol prolonged-release (PR) in patients with or without a neuropathic pain component, with a focus on functional movements, disability and Quality of Life (QoL). Study design/setting: Observational, retrospective study. Patient sample: Ninety-four adult patients with severe neck pain not responsive to opioid step III treatment. Outcome measures: The primary endpoint was a >= 30% improvement of pain intensity at 4 weeks (W4). Several secondary outcomes were evaluated, including neck disability index (NDI), range of motion (ROM), and QoL. Methods: Patients received tapentadol PR at the starting dose of 100 mg/day. Dose titration was allowed in 50 mg increments, up to 500 mg daily. Results: At W4, the primary endpoint of >= 30% improvement of pain was reported in 70% (n = 35; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 55-82%) of patients with a neuropathic pain component and in 69% (n = 20; 95% CI: 49-85%) of those without a neuropathic component. The percentage of patients reporting a neuropathic pain component significantly decreased from baseline (64.2%) to W4 (27.8%). NDI significantly improved in both groups at W12. ROM significantly improved in all three planes of motion (p < .01), with no difference between the two groups. Interference of pain with sleep and QoL also improved. Conclusions: The reduction in pain provided by tapentadol is associated with functional recovery, which may in turn be linked to an improvement in QoL.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available