4.8 Article

Targeted Stimulation of Human Orbitofrontal Networks Disrupts Outcome-Guided Behavior

Journal

CURRENT BIOLOGY
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages 490-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.12.007

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute on Deafness and other Communication Disorders (NIDCD) grant [R01DC015426]
  2. Intramural Research Program at the National Institute on Drug Abuse
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE [ZIADA000587] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Outcome-guided behavior requires knowledge about the current value of expected outcomes. Such behavior can be isolated in the reinforcer devaluation task, which assesses the ability to infer the current value of specific rewards after devaluation. Animal lesion studies demonstrate that orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) is necessary for normal behavior in this task, but a causal role for human OFC in outcome-guided behavior has not been established. Here, we used sham-controlled, non-invasive, continuous thetaburst stimulation (cTBS) to temporarily disrupt human OFC network activity by stimulating a site in the lateral prefrontal cortex that is strongly connected to OFC prior to devaluation of food odor rewards. Subjects in the sham group appropriately avoided Pavlovian cues associated with devalued food odors. However, subjects in the stimulation group persistently chose those cues, even though devaluation of food odors themselves was unaffected by cTBS. This behavioral impairment was mirrored in changes in resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) activity such that subjects in the stimulation group exhibited reduced OFC network connectivity after cTBS, and the magnitude of this reduction was correlated with choices after devaluation. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of indirectly targeting the human OFC with non-invasive cTBS and indicate that OFC is specifically required for inferring the value of expected outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available