4.6 Article

Data-driven individual-joint learning framework for nonlinear process monitoring

Journal

CONTROL ENGINEERING PRACTICE
Volume 95, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2019.104235

Keywords

Individual-joint learning; Deep neural network; Nonlinear process monitoring; Fault detection

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61603138, 61973119]
  2. Shanghai Pujiang Program, China [17PJD009]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China [222201917006, 222201714027]
  4. Programme of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities (111 Project), China [B17017]
  5. Open Research Project of the State Key Laboratory of Industrial Control Technology, Zhejiang University, China [ICT1900331]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Industrial processes are generally characterized by significant nonlinearity, and the monitoring of nonlinear processes remains a challenge. This study proposes a novel data-driven individual-joint learning (IJL) framework for achieving efficient nonlinear process monitoring. First, individual learning is performed by separately establishing stacked autoencoders in process input or output variables to characterize the variable relationship within process input or output. Second, joint learning is performed between the input and output variables to characterize their relationship and extract deep correlated representations. Subsequently, fault detection residuals and statistics are constructed to examine the process status. Given the superiority of deep neural network in representation learning, the complex relationship among process variables can be efficiently characterized, and satisfactory monitoring performance is then obtained. IJL monitoring is tested on the Tennessee Eastman benchmark process and applied on a glycerol distillation process, through which its effectiveness and superiority are demonstrated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available