4.6 Article

Generalized grouped contributions for hierarchical fault diagnosis with group Lasso

Journal

CONTROL ENGINEERING PRACTICE
Volume 93, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2019.104193

Keywords

Fault diagnosis; Multivariate statistical process monitoring; Grouped variable selection; Group lasso; Industrial alarm systems

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61603248]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2019BF021]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M642679]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In process industries, it is necessary to conduct fault diagnosis after abnormality is found, with the aim to identify root cause variables and further provide instructive information for maintenance. Contribution plots along with multivariate statistical process monitoring are standard tools towards this goal, which, however, suffer from the smearing effect and high diagnostic complexity on large-scale processes. In fact, process variables tend to be naturally grouped, and in this work, a novel fault identification strategy based on group Lasso penalty along with a hierarchical fault diagnosis scheme is proposed by leveraging group information among variables. By introducing the group Lasso as a regularization approach, groups of irrelevant variables tend to yield exactly zero contributions collectively, which help find the exact root cause, alleviate the smearing effect, and furnish clear diagnostic information for process practitioners. For online computational convenience, an efficient numerical solution strategy is also presented. Besides, it turns out that the proposed approach also applies to dynamic monitoring models with lagged measurements augmented, thereby enjoying widespread generality. Its effectiveness is evaluated on both the Tennessee Eastman benchmark process and a pilot-scale experiment apparatus.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available