4.1 Review

Considerations for development of an evidence dossier to support the use of mobile sensor technology for clinical outcome assessments in clinical trials

Journal

CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS
Volume 91, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.105962

Keywords

Mobile sensors; Wearables; Clinical endpoints; Clinical validation; Analytical validation; Medical product labelling; New drug applications; Evidence dossier; Clinical outcome assessments; Novel endpoints

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Mobile sensors offer enormous potential for the collection of informative clinical endpoints in clinical trials to support regulatory decision making and product labelling. There are currently no specific guidelines on the information needed to enable regulators to review and accept proposed endpoints derived from mobile sensors for use in drug development trials. Objective: The purpose of this working group report is to recommend the structure and content of an evidence dossier intended to support whether a clinical endpoint derived from mobile sensor data is fit-for-purpose for use in regulatory submissions for drug approvals. Evidence dossier: The structure and content of a dossier to provide evidence supporting the use of a sensorderived clinical endpoint is described. Sections include clinical endpoint definition and positioning, the concept of interest, the context of use, clinical validation and interpretation, study implementation, and analytical validity with sensor performance verification in support of the selected sensor. Conclusions: In the absence of definitive regulatory guidance, this report provides a considered approach to compiling a comprehensive body of evidence to justify acceptance of mobile sensors for support of new drug applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available