4.7 Article

Seismic retrofitting of existing earthen structures using steel plates

Journal

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
Volume 230, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117039

Keywords

Earthen buildings; Adobe walls; Rammed earth walls; Cyclic tests; Shaking table tests

Funding

  1. AIS [UA-0110-15]
  2. Ministerio de Cultura de Colombia
  3. Instituto Distrital de Patrimonio Cultural (IDPC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

During past earthquakes, existing earthen buildings have suffered severe damage or total collapse leading to fatalities and major economic and cultural losses. Poor mechanical properties, out-of-plane instability, lack of seismic diaphragms, and low strength of the connections between structural elements are the most common problems with these types of vernacular constructions. In this research, a novel retrofitting solution, based on steel plates, is proposed to enhance the seismic performance of earthen structures while protecting the life of the occupants and reducing the expected damages. A comprehensive experimental program is conducted to evaluate the seismic behaviour of earthen structural components under both unretrofitted and retrofitted conditions. The experimental program includes four cyclic tests of the proposed connections between steel plates and walls, five cyclic tests of earthen piers, and three full scale shaking table tests of 3.50 m high x 0.60 m thick walls. Observed damage states were related to measured drifts (for cyclic tests) and peak ground accelerations (for dynamic tests). Tests results show that the proposed retrofitting technique substantially increases the stiffness, strength, ductility, and stability of the specimens, which reduces damages and permanent displacements. Retrofitted specimen supported accelerations larger than 1.64g at the roof height without collapse; residual drifts for these demands did not exceed 1.1%. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available